The computer program is based on the formulas presented in  (comparison Adkins vs. Larrabee). Based on the theory of the optimum propeller (as developed by Betz, Prandtl, Glauert), only a small number of design parameters must be specified. These are
The design procedure creates the blade geometry in terms of the chord distribution along the radius as well as the distribution of the blade angle. When you look at the resulting geometry, you might understand why highly efficient propellers for man powered aircraft, indoor free flight models or FAI-F1B rubber powered models look as they look like. The local chord length c depends mainly on the prescribed lift coefficient Cl - if you would like to have wider blades, you have to chose a smaller design lift coefficient (resp. angle of attack) and vice versa. It should be noted, that the design procedure does not work accurately for high thrust loadings as they occur under static conditions. If you receive nonsense values for the blade chord, the power loading of the propeller is probably too high. Check if the power coefficient Pc is less that 1.5, otherwise the theory is not fully applicable and may lead to errors.
The number of blades has a small effect on the efficiency only. Usually a propeller with more blades will perform slightly better, as it distributes its power and thrust more evenly in its wake. But for a given power or thrust, more blades also mean more narrow blades with reduced chord length, so practical limits have to be considered here. The chord length can be increased while decreasing the diameter to keep the power consumption constant, but a diameter reduction is usually a bad idea in terms of efficiency, as long as the tip mach number or tip cavitation is not an issue.
The velocity of the incoming fluid together with the velocity of rotation (r.p.m.) determines the pitch distribution of the propeller. Large pitch propellers may have a good efficiency in their design point, but may run into trouble when the have to operate at axial velocity. In this case, the blades tend to stall. usually the best overall propellers will have a pitch to diameter ratio in the order of 1.
The propeller diameter has a big impact on performance. Usually a larger propeller will have a higher efficiency, as it catches more incoming fluid and distributes its power and thrust on a larger fluid volume. The same effect can be shown for lifting surfaces, which results in sailplanes having large span but slender wings.
Instead of the lift and drag coefficients, it usually convenient to specify an airfoil with a prescribed polar and the design angle of attack at each radius. In JavaProp, definition sections are spread along the radius where airfoil and the design angle of attack can be prescribed. The distribution of Cl and Cd along the radius can be examined later by performing an analysis for the design point. For maximum performance, the airfoils must operate at maximum L/D. But if the propeller should also work reasonable well under off-design conditions, it is usually necessary to use a lower angle of attack for the design. Again, you can check the Cl and Cd distributions for off-design cases by performing several single off-design analysis for different settings of the flow velocity v. Stall should occur gently when the velocity is reduced. The analysis code will probably give unreliable results for very small velocities.
The density of the fluid has no influence on the efficiency of a propeller, but strongly affects its size and shape. As the forces and the power are directly proportional to the fluid density, a hydro-propeller will have much smaller dimensions than a propeller working in air. Also, lifting surface under water tend to develop cavitation when the local pressure of the flow field falls below the vapor pressure. Therefore it is not possible to use high lift coefficients in hydro-props, usually they have to stay below Cl = 0.5. The same is true for high speed tips of aircraft propellers, where not cavitation, but supersonic regions may occur if the pressure gets too low. Therefore the tip sections of propellers operating at Mach numbers above 0.7 should be designed to operate at small lift coefficients below 0.5 too. The analysis module of JavaProp uses the fluid density to calculate thrust and power during the multipoint analysis. The dimensionless coefficients Ct and Cp are not affected by a variation of density, but the values for thrust and power are. Thus a propeller engine combination will find different operating points depending on the fluid density. This makes a difference for aircraft propellers, where the performance of propeller and engine depends on the altitude.
Last modification of this page: 21.05.18
[Back to Home Page] Suggestions? Corrections? Remarks? e-mail: Martin Hepperle.
Due to the increasing amount of SPAM mail, I have to change this e-Mail address regularly. You will always find the latest version in the footer of all my pages.
It might take some time until you receive an answer
and in some cases you may even receive no answer at all. I apologize for this, but
my spare time is limited. If you have not lost patience, you might want to send
me a copy of your e-mail after a month or so.
This is a privately owned, non-profit page of purely educational purpose. Any statements may be incorrect and unsuitable for practical usage. I cannot take any responsibility for actions you perform based on data, assumptions, calculations etc. taken from this web page.
© 1996-2018 Martin Hepperle
You may use the data given in this document for your personal use. If you use this document for a publication, you have to cite the source. A publication of a recompilation of the given material is not allowed, if the resulting product is sold for more than the production costs.
This document may accidentally refer to trade names and trademarks, which are owned by national or international companies, but which are unknown by me. Their rights are fully recognized and these companies are kindly asked to inform me if they do not wish their names to be used at all or to be used in a different way.
This document is part of a frame set and can be found by navigating from the entry point at the Web site http://www.MH-AeroTools.de/.